6/13/2023 0 Comments Resolution calculatorIn certain circumstances, the Court may fix separate advances in respect of a principal claim and a counterclaim. Advance on costsĪs soon as practicable, the Court, taking account of principal claims and counter-claims, fixes the advance on costs payable in equal shares by claimant and respondent (the amount of the provisional advance that has already been paid, which includes the initial US$ 5,000, is credited to claimant’s share). Normally, the Court and Secretariat will wait for this provisional advance to be paid before taking significant steps towards the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal. The provisional advance, is based on the principal claims and is intended to cover the costs of arbitration until the “Terms of Reference” are completed or until the case management conference when the Expedited Procedure Provisions apply. Provisional advanceįixed by the Secretary General upon or soon after receipt of the “Request,” which is to be paid by claimant. Please note that if the bank considers the clarification and corresponding documentation unsatisfactory pursuant to its legal obligations under French law, the payment received by ICC may be delayed, cancelled, or rejected. The filing fee payment should originate from the party to the case or, if payment is made by a third party on behalf of the claimant(s), clarification of the legal relationship with the claimant(s) and proof that this entity is entitled to make payments on behalf of the claimant(s) must also be provided along with the Request. Pursuant to the Note to Parties and Arbitral Tribunals on ICC Compliance, under certain circumstances Claimant parties may be requested to pay the filing fee in EUR currency.Ĭlaimant(s) are invited to transmit proof of filing fee payment to the ICC Secretariat along with their Request. When VAT is applicable (e.g., for Claimant parties established in France) a non-refundable filing fee of US$6,000 is requested. A US$5,000 non-refundable fee is also due from any party that files a request to join an additional party under Article 7.īefore proceeding to payment, Claimant parties should consult the Explanatory Note on VAT Applicable on ICC Administrative Expenses to verify whether French value-added tax (“VAT”) will be payable on their ICC administrative expenses. This is a condition of the Secretariat that notifies the “Request” to the respondent(s). Payment is staggered as follows: Non-refundable filing feeĪ first advance on administrative expenses of US$5,000 is payable by the claimant when it files the “Request for Arbitration”. The advances do not cover legal costs or the fees and expenses of any expert. Holton, Clemens Schulze-Briese and Elspeth F.The ICC advance on costs system is designed to ensure that an arbitration may proceed as soon as the relevant fees and expenses of the arbitrators and the institution are covered. Citingįor details on the theory behind the calculator, what diodes it is and isn't valid for and the limitations of the model please see the paper below.ĭetermination of X-ray flux using silicon pin diodes It will probably give very strange results ouside the range 5.5-20keV and should be considered no more than a ballpark figure. This dose estimate assumes a tophat 100 x 100 micron beam incident on a HEWL crystal of the same size with no heavy atoms present. Please use RADDOSE to estimate this (web interface coming here soon). Please edit the default values: Thickness of Si diodeĭose calculation still to be validated: please use Raddoseīear in mind that specific damage will almost certainly occur in your crystal before the Henderson limit is reached and the presence of any heavy atoms will dramatically increase the absorbed dose. The calibration is valid from 5 keV to 20 keV for details of the calculation used, and the assumptions made, please see the paper referenced below. This calculator does not take electron-hole recombination into account. To calculate the photon flux incident on a silicon pin diode of given characteristics
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |